2010 Kawasaki Z1000

2010 Kawasaki Z1000

Two fantastic bikes, both four cylinder streetfighters. One costs twice as much as the other, but is it twice as good? The Kawasaki Z1000 goes up against the MV Agusta Brutale 1078RR in this Bikematch and the results have suprised us all.

They both look like angry hooligans but that’s where the similiarity ends. The Kawasaki Z1000 is a universal bike capable of doing anything. It has a sit back and relax feel about it with a simple accessibility that makes you feel like you’re part of the bike. The Brutale, in complete contrast, is all aggression and quite a handful to tame. It’s like getting on a rodeo bull and kicking it in the testicles. It’s exciting to ride and fills you with adrenalin but it feels like a caveman on steroids compared to the Z1000′s far less demanding needs.

Looks-wise, everybody I talk to seems to think the Brutale wins hands down. Its a close call but I tend to agree. The Brutale just looks more of how a real motorcycle should look. Stylish, aggressive and quite bold. The Z1000, while being a great looking bike, is just trying too hard to look, well…hard.

In an ideal world, where budget is no barrier, is the Brutale really worth twice as much as the Z1000? While the bikes are completely different in character, owning a Brutale is a more exciting prospect, but wouldn’t it be better to spend half the money on a Z1000 and spend the other half on the finest suspension, tyres and running gear you can get your hands on? Probably not. It still wouldn’t look, sound or feel like a Brutale. However it would let you customise the bike to your exact requirements and allow you to balance ease of use with excitement.

As a pure streetfighter, the Brutale gives you more of the stuff that we ride bikes for…spine tingling excitement and sheer exhilaration. But in the real world, the Z1000 makes more sense. For half the price, it’s a do-it-all bike that still gives you that punch in the adrenal gland when you feel you want a bit of a thrill. For me, it’s the Z1000 (although with the money you save, maybe a second hand Brutale?)

5839by Simon ‘Jim’ Bowen Visordown.com

For many, these are still the two greatest superbikes ever built. Suzuki’s legendary GSX- R1100 went head-to-head with Yamaha’s EXUP for years, and in 1991 the two were at the top of their game. In the days before fuel injection and comedy dry weight claims, we were feasting on the new breed of ultra-fast sports machinery. Long before the madness of ABS and traction control, the route to glory was pure and unadulterated, the object being to place as little as possible between the right hand and the rear wheel. Keep it pure. Keep it simple. Operating on the principle of there being more than two ways to skin a cat, the Japanese giants attacked the same goals with their respective philosophies. Yamaha developed the sharp-edged, finely tuned FZR 1000 Genesis, while Suzuki’s GSX-R attacked the same challenges with muscle and unbreakable brute force. These principles are validated not only in performance and handling characteristics, but also in design and detailing. The GSX- R sits blunt and threatening with aggressive angles and a whiff of the drag strip. The FZR is an altogether more sophisticated and classy-looking creature. The narrow and curvy bodywork flows more coherently over and around the sculptured Deltabox alloy frame with a pretty tailpiece to round it off. Take a pew on the Suzuki though and immediately it feels the more civilised of the two. The seat is low, wide and nicely padded. The rubber-mounted handlebars sit higher than both the FZR and the smaller 750 Suzuki. The body is pitched quite far forward too but it just adds to the overall aggressive stance of the 1100. Long and narrow would summarise the EXUP in a nutshell. The natural position is more racer crouch than the Suzuki despite the similar reach to the bars. The knees are more cramped thanks to the lower seat and the wrists will ache quicker but it’s still spacious and sensible compared to what is being churned out of the same factory today. Thumbing the GSX-R into life brings it all back. In case you’re not sure, the GSX-Rs natural hunting ground is very fast, well surfaced ‘A’ roads (in an era before the dreaded Gatso). The 1100 produces a lot of low-down power and grunt which doesn’t interfere with cruising/touring/motorway behaviour, but back in the day, it’s fair to say that machine performance was well ahead of tyre technology. The ride itself is on the soft side, and takes a firm hand which I think suits the bike. having a huge but relaxed power delivery combined with a world-class 5-speed gearbox is a nice set-up. Not only can you make the Suzuki fly, it was and still is very competent in the braking department. It was often (if not always) the case that the front lever was half way to the ‘bar before anything started to happen, but the initial bite is strong and the braking performance solid with a nice feel at the lever. The Yamaha purrs on tick over compared to the grunting Suzuki and everything about it from every angle is lean, clean and sophisticated. It is also incredibly pretty still and has dated less than Suzuki’s design. Despite giving away a 124cc disadvantage to the GSX-R, Yamaha’s technicians closed the performance gap significantly. So much so, that the Yamaha can virtually match the Suzuki’s grunt in roll-on tests and just about pip it at the top end. Power delivery is less brutal with a smoother, more linear feed leading to a stronger top end than the GSX- R, though this is ultimately more suited to the race track than the street. The gearbox is also a strong point on the FZR. It doesn’t ‘snick’ tightly into gear like the Suzuki but still offers a positive and effortless change. The FZR will hold a better line on a fast or slow corner and drive out more smoothly than the GSX- R, which is prone to being slightly skittish and untidy when hurried. The FZR1000 is the better machine, history showed this to be the case. It is more sophisticated both internally and externally. It is more modern and refined in every department and scores highly with its looks. but the FZRs never, ever got the cult following of the GSX-R1100. From an era when the Gatso camera was a thing of fiction, both these bikes would make excellent classic-bike purchases and have loads of grunt and presence. If you want to look different and get there quick, these old fellas have still got it.

Read the full version of the test here

We’re back on the road (almost)!

Posted: 7th January 2010 by admin in Bikematch

You know how it is. Wife and kids want you to spend more time with them than your beloved bike. We’ve all been getting grief from ‘er indoors (some more than others), but now that the holidays are over we can get back in the saddle and on the road. But there’s a slight problem. SNOW. Where’s all this snow coming from, we’re not in Alaska (or Iceland’s freezer compartments). This is England, it’s only supposed to rain. Anyway, we’ve got more than enough in the memory banks to keep us going so keep on visiting the site, giving us your views and most of all, get back out on the 2 wheeled chariots (weather permitting of course).

125 versus 125

Posted: 30th September 2009 by admin in Bikes for Learners
Cagiva Mito SP525

Cagiva Mito SP525

With more and more people taking to two wheels instead of four, we looked at which learner friendly bikes would make you look cool without leaving a dent in you bank balance.

Cagiva Mito SP525

Cagiva released the Mito SP525 in 2008. Whereas the old version looked like a mini Ducati 916, the SP525 pays homage to the Cagiva V594. MCN’s Trev Franklin says it’s “The most beautiful novice 125cc bike money can buy” and that it behaves like a more road-biased 125 MotoGP bike.
Cool factor Running costs

Suzuki RV125 Van Van

The Retro Suzuki VanVan is a throwback to the original RV125 sand bike of the 70′s, complete with balloon tyres and chrome clocks. The Van Van is too under-powered for the open road, but if you need a funky 125 to bomb along the beach or cruise around the city, the VanVan has wide bars, a big comfy seat and a handy luggage rack.
Cool factor Running costs

Derbi GPR125

Gorgeous angular bodywork and underseat exhaust give the Derbi a supersports look, plus it has the specs to back it up – 2-stroke engine with a claimed 33bhp, radial brakes and suspension developed from the Derbi 125 GP racers. The GPR125 was made for carving up roundabouts.
Cool factor Running costs

Yamaha YZF-R125

The Yamaha YZF-R125 is arguably the best of both worlds, combining the sporty looks normally seen on 2-stroke race rep 125s with a  flexible and reliable 4-stroke motor that’s good for 80mph. It’s also a full-sized motorcycle, slightly larger even than the R6, making it a good choice for taller riders.
Cool factor Running costs

Aprilia Tuono 125

The Tuono 125 is an Aprilia RS125 with the fairings ripped off. Flat bars make it more comfortable and easier to throw around, but it retains all the sporting prowess of the donor RS125 as any good streetfighter should. Reliability is sound as long as it’s looked after and fed (expensive) high quality 2-stoke oil.
Cool factor Running costs

Honda CBF125

The Honda 125 CBF may not be as sexy as some of the other models here, but at £1,795 new it’s an absolute bargain and cool because of its humility. Unlike it’s predecessor the Honda CBR125R, it doesn’t make any false hints at a racing pedigree, it’s just an honest and accessible way into biking that could tempt a few new people on to two wheels.
Cool factor Running costs

2004 Triumph Speed Triple

2004 Triumph Speed Triple

Review by Jon Urry – Visordown.com

All three bikes are great examples and virtually the same price. The Z1000 and Speed Triple may look expensive when sat next to a Tuono that’s over two years fresher but it’s a testament to their re-sale value and a worrying insight into how much someone’s lost on that Tuono in just two years.

So first up the Tuono. I set off and was instantly reminded of the first Tuono I rode back in 2003 when they were launched. For naked bikes they were a revelation, but so stiff and sharp, gone was the plushness of naked bikes like the Ducati Monster. This was a Sambuca shot to the Monster’s Mojito. It’s an all-or-nothing bike, with super-sharp throttle response, rock-hard suspension and an even harder seat. Don’t get me wrong, the Tuono is a buzz, it’s precise and instant, sporty and aggressive and you may think “Yes yes, these are the things I want” but I’m not so sure.

This bike feels anxious and needs to be calmed down. You notice it most the moment you get back on the gas out of a corner; it sits up, jerks forward and demolishes the revs – the motor doesn’t appear to be stressing, there’s no progression of power, just instant on-and-off delivery. The massive bars means the merest millimetre of direction change on the bars puts you on a different side of the road, let alone a different line. I got off the Tuono with a post-rollercoaster like buzz. It doesn’t do anything to chill me out. I like my nakeds relaxed and – for a seriously capable bike – that’s one thing the Tuono can’t do.

Next up, the Z1000. It’s the first time I’ve ridden a Z1000, so I’m quite excited by it. We stopped after 10 miles and my exacting analysis of it was ‘It’s just like a big Z750’. No shit Sherlock, you might think, but I’ve never ridden a bike that replicates it’s bigger, or smaller, sibling.

When you see the Z1000 parked up you expect its brutish looks to be backed up by a grunty, blunt engine with loads of torque, but the Z1000’s motor fizzes away, not delivering much down low but more than making up for it once the revs hit the sky, which consequently is shortly followed by the front wheel in first and second gear.
It’s pliable and smooth, no lumpy dollops of torque to upset your line, you can feed in the power precisely and it makes the Z1000 rewarding to thread through a good set of bends. Our version had a funny-looking official Kawasaki fly-screen fitted, which made it good for just over 140mph. You can cruise at 100mph no problems, and I reckon you could chip halfway into France in one hit and not need too much of a massage afterwards.

The Z1000 is too rounded, nothing stands out and I love a bike with character. It’s like your family Labrador; easy to live with, reliable and you can feed it on Pedigree Chum. On second thoughts, if you want to fire it up and get lost for an hour, a day or a week, you know the Z1000’s going to do it all.

So finally, the Speed Triple. In this company it looks dated, not just the silhouette but it’s non-LED rear light, analogue dash and right-way up forks. That said, this one’s in mint nick and with just 9,000 miles on the clock it’s hiding its age well.  Straight away the Speed Triple’s riding position feels right and the lack of fuss infront of you leaves you to focus on the road ahead. The Speed Triple, whether it intended to or not, has a refreshing lack of data being fired at you from the speedo unit, just revs and speed. But it’s not short on feedback from the front-end. It feels light and agile, much more compact than the Z1000 and less rigid than the Tuono. The Triple feels precise without being over-eager. And I love the engine. It’s like the Z1000 but with added torque low down.

So as we started off on this test, for me, the Tuono had won before we even started. With that spec, at that price it just had to. But it felt like it would be more at home peeling into Paddock Hill Bend than your local pub car-park after a good-old country lane blast. As the most involving, the most interesting and the best value for money – especially if you pick up an older model – the Triumph Speed Triple is my choice.

The Yamaha looks dated and unattractive, yet purposeful and menacing. It is adorned with the finest equipment money could then buy. Nice touches adorn it – the span adjustable levers and electronic fuel reserve switch – all futuristic back in ’93. Its price tag today is high enough to make you wince but 15 years back, it was absolutely through the roof and gave the pub bullshitters all the ammo they needed to threaten everyone within earshot about how they would be turning up at the pub the very next day on their shiny new race bike.

The Ducati SP5 couldn’t be more different and provides enough of a talking point in the design department alone. It was always a bit of a stunner but dated during the 916 years and became less loved and less impressive. Yet now it has made a remarkable return to its former beauty. As the1098 has adopted a sharper set of angles, the 916 is looking a little frumpy and unfashionable yet this immaculate SP5 number 186 is tiny, pretty and oozes designer class and racing pedigree. No flashy stick-on graphics here. Its subtle curves, twin carbon Termignoni’s, squared off headlamp and high-stepped tail unit with extra thick bum are back in vogue.

The OW01 still has a wow factor, but not in the looks department. This bike is all about revs, just look at the spec sheets – maximum torque and horsepower at 10,500rpm and 12,500rpm respectively, and that’s before the race kit. It’s comfortable too. The pegs are quite high but there’s a decent stretch to the handlebars and enough room to shuffle around the seat area to get the fit right. The riders-eye view is more endurance racer than road bike, but then it is most definitely more of a street-legal race bike than a nicely kitted road bike. It’s not lightning fast but very quick – similar to a two year-old 600 – and has that same rev dependency. It would be tiresome though, without the EXUP system that prevents the power delivery from becoming an on/off affair.

The effect that the SP5 experience has on the heart rate is hard to match. Not only does it make you feel special, it requires a level of concentration and input not normally associated with a V-twin, and with that comes the reward. It is impossible to not get a thrill from this particular Desmo experience, and realise how close you are to riding the all-conquering WSB assault vehicle. The Yamaha is special, but just can’t match the emotional overload that comes with riding a true legend.

Kawasaki's ZZR1200 and ZZR1400

Kawasaki's ZZR1200 and ZZR1400

Article from www.visordown.com

Pitching the 14 up against its four year-old forebearer, the ZZR1200, should seem a foregone conclusion. And of course with the ZZR1200 being a sports tourer, not a super sports (the ZX-12R was Kawasaki’s big-capacity super sports back then) the old bike’s soft-focus should see it steam-rolled. Only we’ll give you a hint as to what’s coming, right now. You see, the touring ZZR1200 of 2002 in fact had a powered-up motor, making in the order of 8% more power than the ZZR1100.

The 1400 motor isn’t listed as ‘new’ but with significantly bigger bore and stroke dimensions it’s a full 188cc bigger than the ZZR1200. Now fuel injected, according to Kawasaki the new engine has been massively tuned, their figures putting the ZZR1400 as 25% more powerful than the ZZR1200. Yep, Kawasaki claim 200bhp with ram-air assistance, Only here’s a thing: on Carbontek’s dyno that 200 figure converted to 165.7bhp at the rear wheel – a figure which is barely 14% up on the ZZR1200′s motor. Now that doesn’t sound so earth shatteringly massive does it? And if we’d known that when we came to do our side-by-side roll-on tests we wouldn’t have been so shocked at the outcome. You see, there we were at 5.30am on the motorway to Dover, checking out 60 to 120mph top gear acceleration. And what happened? Dead heats. Actually not even that. Some the ZZR1200 won. The only difference was rider reaction time; whatever was won or lost was done on the initial twist of the wrist. We even tried the same roll-ons in fifth and fourth gears – and still no discernable differences. Holy cow! Can this be true? Well, we rang Kawasaki UK when we got back and told them. The response wasn’t official, but they explained that the real power gains – as is the modern way – are really found in the higher realms of the rev range. So we probably wouldn’t be finding the differences sub-120mph.
But put these two on some twisting roads, and some really twisting, well contoured ones at that, and you’ll find the ZZR1400 steams away. Only now we’re not convinced that’s entirely due to the motor, however strong it is, for often the technique to fast progress with the 1400 was to short shift and let the motor torque.

The ZZR1400 motor also struggled, curiously, when ridden sort of ‘furiously’ for the photoshoot. When turning in the road for repeated passes past the photographer the ZZR1400 would fluff badly off the bottom, requiring clutch slip and a good handful to get it going. By contrast you could U-turn the ZZR1200 and then, with a deft dip of the clutch, launch the old ‘un up the road with a satisfyingly large and lusty wheely.

The 1400 is, without a doubt, altogether a more dynamic and thrilling package. The chassis, an aluminium monocoque, is a development of that used in the ZX-12R but is massively better than that. Kawasaki claim the monocoque is inherently more rigid than a twin-spar frame, and the ZZR1400 feels low and intuitive. Weight is of course down – a claimed 215kg (dry) as against the ZZR1200′s 236kg. And the geometry is sharper again, 23û compared to 25¡. Significantly the suspension is now of a super sports specification. The 43mm Kayabas are now inverted with compression and rebound damping adjustment and the same goes for the shock. Running on lighter wheels (we can’t confirm how much lighter) with the latest 310mm petal discs and radial four-piston brakes, the ZZR1400 feels supremely confident at speed, even on the twistiest roads. We repeated two sections of road. The first featured a blind crest taken charging in the middle part of third gear, which was followed by a steep downhill and hairpin turn. Here it was a challenge to freak yourself out by attacking the crest as hard as you dare – a crest taken with some lean on. Yet the 14 never budged from its line. Easy. It was only the hairpin which challenged the 1400. Here the suspension took too long to settle and it took positive throttle to hold it all together. Some time with the adjusters would have helped. The other section of road, a stunning third gear drive up a sweeping uphill left leading into a second gear right again showed how far the ZZR has come. The 1200 should have been able to keep up, but its handling just fell apart. The ZZR1400 simply goaded you on to ride harder and harder.

Lookswise, the ZZR1200 won’t ever be a classic. It took the remarkably restrained yet powerful curves and flanks of the ZZR1100 and added a set of Ford Mondeo lights circa 1997. Big blobby headlights and taillights do not an attractive roadbike make. Of course they may be supremely effective in use, but that’s not what we’re discussing here. The ZZR had always been mega-comfy, and now it was made to look it. No longer pegged as a GSX-R-killer as it earlier had, it was now fighting BMW K1200STs and Triumph Sprint STs.
The ZZR1400 looks bloody great. Big and brutal with some really classy touches, it’s properly slippery while also working that Big Bike look to perfection. It’s long, it looks long and of course, it looks sporty again. The wheels have that racy look, as do the brakes. The screen’s lower and Lamborghini vents (last seen on 1995′s Honda VFR750) are back with a vengeance.

The 1400 marks a return of the ZZR to the mantle it was originally designed for – super sports. Steering the ZZR1200 into touring, to allow the ZX-12R to take over at the pointy end was a slight on the ZZR’s reputation. Even now, reading the performance figures and our roll-on tests, we can’t believe how strong the old bike went. The chassis was hopelessly outgunned by the new bike, though. But with Kawasaki now putting the ZZR back on the top shelf and creating the GTR to match the new spec demanded for touring types, equilibrium in the Kawaski sporting line up is restored. When a five-year-old bike can accelerate alongside the most powerful sports bike ever, it’s impossible not to be impressed, but time is a hard master and the great chassis on the ZZR1400, not to mention sharp looks, made the new bike untouchable.

rsv4_factory.jpg

Article from www.visordown.com

The RSV4 Factory is too small and far too firm, both of suspension and of seat, to be road-practical in any rational sense, but when you actually get to the bits of road we ride for, those dry, well-sighted corner-complexes miles from anywhere, the Aprilia experience is pixel-perfect High Definition next to the Blade’s slighty fuzzy cathode-ray alternative. The Italian bike is completely locked down, with no lost movement from either its suspension or its Pirelli Supercorsa tyres.

It reacts to your every input with a shocking immediacy and accuracy, babbling away with priceless feedback that encourages you to attack every corner like Ben Spies’ R1 is on your tail. The brakes are similarly honest – there’s no initial comfort travel, no fuzz, just the kind of stopping power that swells confidence. And then there’s the engine: powerful, drivable, usable and as beautiful to listen to as it is to use. The little things are right, too. The engine may be hugely powerful but the on/off fuelling’s perfect and the few degrees of dead travel in the throttle perfectly judged, the power’s there only when you want it. The gearbox is good too, with a shift action that’s been improved noticeably since the launch bikes.

So yes, if you really do spend hours at a time in the saddle, crossing the Channel to playground Europe every couple of weeks in summer to junk a pair of tyres, go Fireblade – the Aprilia will batter your backside into surrendering long before you reach Dover.

But if you live for those snatched moments of dynamic bliss that elevate riding a motorcycle to something with angels singing and stuff, you worship race bikes as some people do that God chap and you hear race engines in your dreams, whether they belong to Doohan’s Suzuka 8 Hour RVF or Andrea Dovizioso’s RCV on the overrun, the RSV4 is every bit as awesome as you dared dream it would be. That it’s also beautifully built, with detailing you could lose months taking in, is just the cherry on a cake the size of Rome’s Coliseum.

Suzuki V-Strom

Suzuki V-Strom

The Honda XL650V Translap was one of the first twin-cylinder Japanese trail-style bikes and over the years it’s required a reputation for being one of the most reliable machines ever built. Suzuki’s DL650 V-Strom is the new kid on the block by comparison but what it lacks in pedigree it makes up for in luxury and specification. Both are pretty cheap to buy and run, servicing and insurance costs are low and both can give you over 60mpg.

For a machine to jump on and get instant thrills, the Translap misses the mark, but it excels either as a comfy, capable workhorse or as a round-the-world trip-of-a-lifetime bike. Once you’ve accepted the modest engine performance it’s easy to see its other bonus points. It’s easy to ride, relaxed and comfortable. It tips nicely into corners and is smooth enough to never catch you out. Build quality and reliability are excellent. It’s a durable machine and resists corrosion better than most. In the world of high speed, high octane sportsbikes, the Translap is a refreshing alternative…or a bit dull, depending on your point of view.

The V-Strom is much larger and plusher than the Translap, the engine has a lot more get-up-and-go, and the whole package gels superbly. Unlike the Translap, this is a bike that outperforms its specification. It has great balance, a smooth and torquey engine and a light clutch so it’s great around town and gives you confidence when you pick up the pace. It’s no sportsbike but it’s still nippy with good handling and excellent brakes. It’s incredibly comfortable with a large seat, natural riding position and the mirror position are among the best we’ve experienced. This is a superb machine and one of the most underated bikes you can buy.

The V-Strom is much more exciting than the Translap and capable of bringing a smile to your face whether you’re commuting, touring or giving it a Sunday blast. The V-Strom wins the Bikematch challenge.

Ducati Desmosedici

Ducati Desmosedici

Beautifully exclusive and a price tag of around £40,000. One of them is new, the other is, well, slightly older but both are supreme examples of desirability. However, with a price tag like this, do you get a bike that is that much better than the standard Ducati or Honda or is it simply a case of paying for exclusivity. We’ll be doing a lot of research on these bikes and letting you know whether you should really believe the hype. Visit us regularly for updates and let us know if you have been lucky enough to ride or own one of these motorcycling masterpieces.